Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Computational text analysis reveals widespread public anger and disgust toward a migrant care worker pilot project, highlighting contested boundaries of civic belonging.
In 2024, the Seoul Metropolitan Government launched the Foreign Housekeeping Managers Pilot Project, employing Filipino domestic workers to address care labour shortages amid low fertility and aging. As Korea's first formal institutionalisation of migrant care work, it offers a rare chance to observe how public commenters on Naver, the country's dominant news portal, interpret and contest this change. Using a mixed-methods computational approach combining manual topic classification, LDA topic modelling, and deep learning-based sentiment analysis, we analyse 543 news articles and 20,685 comments from September 2024 to April 2025. Seven themes appeared: working conditions and wages, policy rollout, public reactions, international comparisons, migrant rights concerns, the programme as a response to care shortages and fertility decline, and alternative models. Sentiment skewed heavily negative, dominated by anger and disgust tied to perceived unfairness and contested belonging. Fluctuations tracked policy events, showing how administrative developments became political flashpoints. We use the concept of affective boundary-making, advanced as a synthesis of symbolic boundary work and affective publics rather than as a new theoretical construct, to describe how anger and disgust function as the medium through which deservingness boundaries are drawn during the pre-institutional phase of a care-migration policy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: