Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Retrospective modeling study demonstrates superior historical reconstruction of pipe failure rates by XGBoost over Random Forest, highlighting pipe length and age as key drivers.
Water-distribution-system failure records often contain nonlinear, heterogeneous patterns that are difficult to summarize with conventional statistics alone. This study evaluates how Random Forest and XGBoost reconstruct normalized water-pipe failure-rate patterns in a field-derived Malatya, Türkiye dataset and uses distributional diagnostics, empirical ranking, and multi-method explainability to identify stable model drivers. The analysis includes 1231 records from nine source-defined clusters and four modelling inputs: cluster identifier, normalized pipe length, normalized pipe diameter, and normalized second-failure age. Because the models were fitted to and evaluated on the same records, the reported performance represents apparent/full-data goodness of fit rather than independent predictive validation. XGBoost provided the closer reconstruction (R2 = 0.9189 versus 0.8523 for Random Forest; MAE = 0.0230 versus 0.0321). Across permutation importance, SHAP attribution, and variable-removal sensitivity, pipe length and second-failure age emerged as the most robust model-relevant features, whereas native importance was more method-dependent. The framework demonstrates how ensemble models can support transparent retrospective database screening and pattern interpretation while maintaining a clear boundary between historical fit and forecasting. Temporal, spatial, pipe-grouped, or external validation is required before prospective decision use.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Koca et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: