Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Cross-sectional study finds diagnosis-specific information predicts patient satisfaction in adults with ADHD, highlighting the need for quality post-diagnostic education.
Objective The primary aim of this study was to explore the patient satisfaction among adults recently diagnosed with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) at an outpatient mental health centre. The secondary aim was to investigate the relative contribution of demographic characteristics, ADHD symptom severity, general self-efficacy, and perceived quality of diagnosis-specific information to overall patient satisfaction. Methods From April 2017 to January 2019, cross-sectional data were obtained from 56 adults recruited from an outpatient mental health centre after being diagnosed with ADHD. Patient satisfaction was measured using the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire-8 (CSQ-8). ADHD symptoms were measured using the Adult ADHD Self-Report Scale 6. Self-efficacy was measured using the General Self-Efficacy 6 for ADHD, and perceived quality of diagnosis-specific information was measured using a single-item measure used in earlier research. A multiple linear regression analysis was conducted to evaluate the relative contribution of the included variables. Results The mean satisfaction score of the sample on the CSQ-8 was 24.1, indicating medium satisfaction. Another 42.9% were satisfied “to a small extent” or “not at all” with the information they had received about ADHD. Satisfaction with ADHD-related information was the only variable significantly associated with overall patient satisfaction after adjustment for the other variables in the model (standardised β = 0.71). The regression model explained 43% ( Adj.R 2 = 0.43) of the variance in overall patient satisfaction. Conclusion Our findings indicate an association between satisfaction with diagnosis-specific information and overall patient satisfaction among adults with ADHD. Given the cross-sectional design and small sample size, further research is needed to determine the direction and nature of this relationship.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pedersen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: