Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Theoretical model reveals cosmic expansion through quantum vacuum fracture and melting, suggesting an inflation-free mechanism that resolves the Hubble tension.
We present ERF model where physical vacuum is quantum elastic solid. Fracture precedes melting according to Griffith criterion G>=Gc=2gamma. Initial isothermal crack L0 melts into expanding droplet R(t)=sqrt(R0^2+2 D ΔT t) identified with observable universe. Derived parameters from first principles: shear modulus mu=c^4/(8πG) renormalized, breaking stress sigma_cr=c^7/(ħG^2)=4.63e113 Pa, ratio beta=mu/K≈0.1 from causality window 0.05-0.15 and Poisson ratio nu=0.45 giving 0.103, independent of Hubble data. Agreement with Hubble tension 67 vs 73 km/s/Mpc is consistency check not fit. No free parameters. Six testable predictions: elastic redshift z_elastic=(mu/K)ln(R/R0), lattice residual xi_ERF with matched filter SNR≥5 validated via 1000 Poisson mocks SNR=7.2±1.1 for DESI Y5, spacetime phonons omega_t=c_t k, CMB quadrupole Q=Δmu/mu≈2e-6 matching Planck 2.2e-6, GW echoes Δt≈0.1s, ΔG/G=-4Δα/α dipole. Thermodynamic stability via Mullins-Sekerka self-regulation v_n=DΔT/R lifetime τ≈50 Gyr. Field equations Carter-Quintana G_ij=(8πG/c⁴)(T_matter+T_elastic) conserved. Transition Elastic→GR at z*≈1.5-2.5, cracking at z≈1e31 leaves low-ell quadrupole, homogeneity from isothermal crack offering mechanism potentially circumventing inflation. Complete system 32 points full detailed explanations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Maher Jaber Shamran (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: