Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Full-scale field experiment demonstrates that discontinuous geofoam trenches match open trenches at higher frequencies, suggesting a cost-effective passive vibration screening alternative.
This paper examines the effectiveness of different geofoam-infilled trenches (GT) in mitigating ground-borne vibrations under passive vibration screening (PVS) conditions. Owing to the substantial cost of continuous geofoam-infilled trenches (GTC), the present work investigates the efficacy of discontinuous geofoam-infilled trenches, including intermittent (GTI) and staggered (GTS) configurations, to mitigate ground-borne vibrations under PVS conditions through full-scale field experiments. A modular system comprising prefabricated panels is adopted for installing GT, enabling untroubled installation, removal, reuse, and customisation. The frequency-dependent performance of OT and GT under PVS conditions to be thoroughly evaluated. Experimental findings indicate that the performance of GTI and GTS is comparable to that of the open trench (OT) at higher input frequency (fi). The effectiveness of all trenches increases with increasing fi. However, at lower fi, OT and various GT configurations are found to be ineffective in mitigating vibrations at locations far beyond the trench. Furthermore, regression analysis is used to establish a simplified design equation to predict the effectiveness of various GT configurations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Singh et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: