Review reveals fouling mitigation mechanisms in renewable-energy reverse osmosis systems, highlighting the need for AI monitoring and green chemistries to sustain wastewater reuse.
Freshwater scarcity and rising wastewater generation have intensified global reliance on desalination and reuse, with reverse osmosis (RO) providing 65–70% of installed desalination capacity and achieving energy reductions from 15 kWhm−3 in the 1970s to 1.8–2.5 kWhm−3 today. However, fouling caused by organics, inorganics, microorganisms, and colloids remains the major operational challenge, accounting for ≈25% of RO costs and over USD 15 billion annually. This review synthesises fouling mechanisms and mitigation strategies in renewable energy (RE)-driven RO wastewater-treatment systems, where intermittency exacerbates fouling through start–stop cycles and low-shear conditions. Analysis of recent literature highlights that mixed fouling reduces flux by 10–30%, increases transmembrane pressure, and deteriorates permeate quality. Advances in pretreatment (coagulation, MF/UF), antifouling membranes (hydrophilic coatings, zwitterionic surfaces), and cleaning protocols (osmotic backwashing, nanobubbles) have improved performance, yet complete prevention remains elusive. Persistent gaps include predictive fouling models, standardised performance metrics, and scalable green chemistries for silica and combined fouling control. Future directions emphasise integrated solutions combining advanced materials, AI-driven monitoring, and renewable-aware operational strategies, alongside circular economy approaches for brine valorisation. These innovations are critical for achieving sustainable, low-carbon RO systems for global water security.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Uddin et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: