Methodological modeling demonstrates multi-sector climate, health, and ecological impacts across United States jurisdictions, suggesting scalable evaluation for clean energy interventions.
This document is the methodology of record for EMPATHI, Energy Metrics for Project Assessment of Trade-offs and Human Impacts, a framework that translates a user defined electricity sector intervention into projected avoided emissions and the downstream climate, public health, and ecological outcomes that follow from them. The framework covers thirteen technology options across 53 United States jurisdictions, with twelve emissions projection schemes and five Shared Socioeconomic Pathways. It integrates EPA AVERT, NREL Cambium, EPA eGRID, and EPA COBRA derived health relationships resolved to the jurisdiction in which the emission change occurs, and it reconstructs the DICE-EMR mortality cost of carbon (MCC) to enable scenario dependence and project scale evaluation. Regional temperature scaling from the Sixth Assessment Report climate reference regions carries the global response down to each jurisdiction, supporting estimates of avoided exposure to hot, wet and dry extremes, hydroclimate whiplash, area burned and extreme daily fire growth in California, and mortality from wildfire smoke. A cost layer expresses those outcomes per dollar of intervention. This reference documents the data sources, governing equations, parameters, validation, and limitations of each module integrated in EMPATHI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jacob McNevin (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: