Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Comparative case analysis reveals elastic sovereignty across Eurasian and Afro-Asian geopolitical inserts, indicating that structural international change emerges endogenously through bounded zones.
We propose “liminal ecotones” to study endogenous change in the Westphalian sovereign model by coupling liminality’s reversible thresholds with the ecotone’s edge-effects and filtering. We operationalize this through A–V–E–R: Anchor (system-serving conflict de-escalation), Vector (alternative-order projection articulated within host law), Edge-effects (intensified exchanges with selective filtering), and Reversibility (incomplete contracting that splits use- from residual-control rights). The heuristic renders transgression admissible, showing sovereignty as allocative, uneven, and elastic rather than binary. We apply it to three heterogeneous inserts: China’s base in Djibouti tests military-logistical projection; the proposed Zangezur corridor tests infrastructural-connectivity and pan-Turkic de-escalation-through-trade; and Palestinian diplomatic representation tests recognition-seeking under incomplete sovereignty. Each enters through a public-goods anchor while projecting an alternative political order. Together they show that structural change need not be exogenous or macro-level: bounded, selectively-permeable sites accelerate power, trade, and recognition from within while remaining reversible.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hynek et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: