Algorithm evaluation demonstrates accurate hazard recognition in power worksites, highlighting the feasibility of regulation-grounded explanations.
Automated power-worksite monitoring requires accurate event recognition and auditable explanations. This paper presents PowerXGraph++, a regulation-constrained spatiotemporal evidence-graph framework for missing PPE, boundary crossing, unsafe proximity, falls, and fire/smoke. Typed evidence tokens are encoded by a transformer; full-context prediction is separated from explanation selection, and explanations are tested for sufficiency, necessity, sparsity, and regulation consistency. Distillation, event-boundary counterfactuals, background-invariance training, and non-inferiority checkpoint selection preserve predictive performance. On annotation-derived construction-PPE graphs, three-seed Macro-F1, violation recall, and rationale F1 were 0.989, 0.965, and 0.901. Under the same frozen predictor, the supervised, grammar-aware selector attained rationale F1 of 0.983 and regulation consistency of 1.000, although the post hoc baselines lacked equivalent supervision. A single YOLO reproduction run using seed 17 on 197 matched person graphs yielded Macro-F1 of 0.844, missing-PPE recall of 0.591, and rationale F1 of 0.660. Expert evaluation produced Fleiss’ kappa of 0.740 and method-to-majority rationale F1 of 0.870. Held-out-camera reasoning and a two-camera fence-crossing pilot provide additional evidence under supplied-evidence conditions; the results do not establish automatic generation of every semantic predicate or unrestricted raw video performance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: