Mixed-methods analysis demonstrates lower costs and emissions from participatory sustainable housing in post-disaster zones, highlighting viable frameworks for equitable reconstruction.
This article presents the results of a research study aimed at designing and evaluating sustainable housing (SH) in post-disaster contexts in Juchitán de Zaragoza, Oaxaca, Mexico, following the 2017 earthquakes. The proposed model integrates four fundamental dimensions: (i) housing design using traditional architecture; (ii) analysis of the environmental impact of materials using indicators of CO2 emissions, energy consumption, and thermal performance; (iii) comparative evaluation of construction costs relative to conventional housing (CH); and (iv) implementation of a Social Production of Habitat (SPH) approach. A mixed-methods design was adopted, involving literature review, data collection through an environmental and hygrothermal impact study, comparative cost estimates, and semi-structured interviews. The findings show that the use of local, low-impact materials, together with participatory processes, not only reduces costs and environmental externalities but also strengthens the social fabric and contributes to a more equitable reconstruction that is contextualized within traditional architecture. The housing model developed may serve as a reference for post-disaster reconstruction strategies in other contexts, provided it is adapted to local climatic, cultural, material, and regulatory conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Montes et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: