Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In vitro study demonstrates a 0.3-millimeter interdental space reproduction threshold for intraoral scanners, indicating that glove-based color filtering does not improve scanning accuracy.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of space blockage by colored gloved fingers and color-filtering on space reproduction of 2 intraoral scanners (IOSs) for adjacent veneer preparations, before and after postprocessing. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Veneer preparations were performed on two extracted teeth. Two IOSs were tested: i700 and i900. Five groups were created (from 0.1 to 0.5 mm) with four subgroups based on the glove color: none, pink, blue, and black. Specimens were assessed before and after postprocessing: no error, partial error (< 25% or 25%-50%), or complete error (> 50%). Fisher's test was used (α = 0.05). RESULTS: Neither IOS reproduced the 0.1- or 0.2-mm spaces before or after postprocessing, whereas both reproduced the 0.3-mm space after postprocessing, except in the black-gloved subgroup. Differences were observed in the 0.3-, 0.4-, and 0.5-mm groups before and after postprocessing. Before postprocessing, the i700 reproduced 0.3- and 0.4-mm spaces in the pink and blue subgroups and 0.5-mm spaces in the none, pink, and blue subgroups; the i900 reproduced 0.3-mm spaces in the none and blue subgroups and 0.4- and 0.5-mm spaces in the none, pink, and blue subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: Space reproduction threshold was 0.3 mm for both IOSs. Glove-based color filters did not enhance space reproduction. In the i700, the black-glove filter negatively affected 0.5-mm space reproduction after postprocessing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Revilla‐León et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: