Observational study reveals distinct student-AI interaction profiles in interpreting trainees, indicating comprehension-stage AI reliance drives performance.
While student-AI interaction patterns have been explored in self-paced cross-linguistic tasks such as L2 writing and translation post-editing, little is known about how students interact with AI in bilingual tasks under intense cognitive and temporal constraints. This study uses computer-assisted consecutive interpreting (CACI) as a window to examine student-AI interaction patterns in such high-stakes environments. Twenty-two Chinese-native interpreting trainees, grouped by prior AI training experience, performed bidirectional CACI tasks using AI-enabled systems integrating automatic speech recognition (ASR) and machine translation (MT) features. With data collected from eye-tracking, pen-recording, and voice-recording, the study reveals that: (a) four interpretable interaction profiles emerge: Intensive Engagers (heavy AI reliance), Fast Scanners (scanning-based processing), Traditionalists (minimal AI reliance), and Frequent Switchers (shifts between AI support and handwritten notes); (b) these patterns shift dynamically between the comprehension and production stages of interpreting, while targeted CACI training was associated with more stable, AI-oriented patterns; and (c) students’ interaction patterns during the comprehension stage, but not the production stage, are significantly associated with performance quality. These findings highlight the heterogeneity and variability of student-AI interaction patterns across different stages of complex bilingual tasks and underscore training effects on shaping students’ behaviors and performance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kuang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: