Comparative study demonstrates the feasibility of enzymatic and bisulfite sequencing for DNA methylation in archival triple-negative breast cancer samples, highlighting method-specific trade-offs.
DNA methylation at the 5′ position of cytosine is a classical epigenetic mark in the human genome, and alterations in DNA methylation are frequently observed in cancer. Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue is widely used in next-generation sequencing (NGS) for retrospective molecular studies due to preserved tissue architecture and extensive clinically annotated archives. However, fragmented and degraded nucleic acids often limit its utility. Although whole-genome bisulfite sequencing (WGBS) has long been the gold standard for assessing DNA copy-number and methylation, newer enzymatic approaches such as enzymatic-methylation sequencing (EM-seq) and the biomodal duet multiomics solution evoC kit have emerged. Here, we characterized these three methods in FFPE residual triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) tissue. TNBC is the most aggressive breast cancer subtype, lacks targetable alterations, and is associated with a high risk of local and distant recurrence, with most metastatic progression occurring within three years of diagnosis. Our findings demonstrate the feasibility of applying all three sequencing approaches to low-input FFPE residual TNBC samples and highlight the method-specific trade-offs that should be considered when selecting a sequencing strategy. These findings support a streamlined framework for genetic and epigenetic profiling of archival FFPE residual TNBC samples and future cohort expansion.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gopal et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: