Key result
In untreated severe aortic stenosis, concurrent moderate-to-severe or severe mitral regurgitation was associated with higher 2-year mortality than less than moderate MR (65.5% vs 36.8%, P<0.001).
Why the study?
Aortic stenosis and mitral regurgitation frequently co-occur, complicating diagnosis and treatment, leaving current US treatment trends and patient outcomes unclear.
What is the prognostic impact of concurrent mitral regurgitation in severe aortic stenosis, and does TAVR improve MR severity?
Cohort (n=36,402)
Yes
What is the prognostic impact of concurrent mitral regurgitation in severe aortic stenosis, and does TAVR improve MR severity?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Concurrent significant mitral regurgitation in severe aortic stenosis is associated with high mortality and frequent undertreatment, though TAVR alone improves MR in the majority of treated patients.
BACKGROUND: Aortic stenosis (AS) and mitral regurgitation (MR) frequently co-occur, complicating diagnosis and treatment. We examined current US treatment trends and patient outcomes among patients with severe AS and at least moderate MR. METHODS: We analyzed data from 2 992 362 patients (aged ≥18 years) undergoing 5 245 904 echocardiograms at 43 US institutions (Egnite Database; Egnite, Aliso Viejo, CA, with permissions) to identify a cohort of patients with severe AS and moderate or greater MR. The primary end point was 2-year all-cause mortality, assessed via Kaplan-Meier analysis. For patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) alone, MR severity changes from baseline to 45 days post-TAVR were visualized using Sankey diagrams. RESULTS: The cohort included 36 402 patients (mean age, 78.2 years; 54.6% male), of whom 52.0% were untreated, 36.5% underwent TAVR alone, and 11.5% underwent surgery or other transcatheter interventions. Two-year mortality for untreated patients was 36.8% (95% CI, 35.6%–38.0%) for AS with less than moderate MR, 57.3% (95% CI, 54.0%–60.6%) for AS with moderate MR, and 65.5% (95% CI, 60.9%–70.1%) for AS with moderate-to-severe or severe MR (log-rank P <0.001). Undertreatment was more frequent in patients with AS and significant MR (64.5% versus 49.9%, P <0.001). Among patients undergoing TAVR alone with follow-up MR data, 77.5% demonstrated improvement in MR. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with concurrent MR and AS exhibit substantially higher mortality yet have high rates of undertreatment throughout the duration of follow-up. TAVR alone significantly improves MR in most patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Peterson et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Severe aortic stenosis and at least moderate mitral regurgitation (n=36,402). Moderate-to-severe or severe mitral regurgitation vs. Less than moderate mitral regurgitation was evaluated on 2-year all-cause mortality (p=<0.001). In untreated severe aortic stenosis, concurrent moderate-to-severe or severe mitral regurgitation was associated with higher 2-year mortality than less than moderate MR (65.5% vs 36.8%, P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: