Theoretical analysis demonstrates that generalized Bayesian posteriors act as risk identifiers, suggesting new variational inference frameworks and bandit optimization methods.
The Bayes posterior solves the variational problem of maximizing the expected likelihood of the data minus the Kullback–Leibler divergence from the prior distribution. We generalize Bayesian inference from this variational point of view. In particular, we introduce a variational inference (VI) problem whose solutions we call posteriors and show that these posteriors are risk identifiers, i.e., subgradients of risk measures. This insight leads to: ( i ) rigorous results concerning the existence and asymptotics of posteriors, ( ii ) the ability to constrain the divergence from the prior—which motivates a measure-valued relaxation of M-estimation that we call coherent inference —and ( iii ) insights into VI problems derived from φ -divergences. These insights include semi-analytical expressions for posteriors and connections with utility theory. We use the semi-analytical expressions for φ -divergence posteriors to numerically solve a multi-armed bandit problem.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Javeed et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: