Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Cohort study reveals nonlinear joint impacts of air pollution and greenness on chronic disease in older adults, highlighting benefits of coordinated environmental policies.
Long–term exposure to fine particulate matter (PM 2.5 ) and residential greenness are often correlated but commonly evaluated separately. We examined the joint nonlinear associations with chronic disease outcomes and estimated potential health gains under counterfactual scenarios among middle-aged and older adults in China. We analyzed 33,712 participant-wave observations from the China Family Panel Studies (CFPS; 2010–2022). Chronic disease status was based on self-reported physician-diagnosed conditions. County/district-level PM 2.5 and Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) exposures were assigned using 10-year lagged averages. Generalized additive mixed models with participant-specific random intercepts and survey-wave fixed effects estimated single- and joint-exposure response functions, followed by health impact assessment (HIA). In fully adjusted single-exposure models, both PM 2.5 and NDVI smooth terms remained significant (effective degrees of freedom [EDF] = 2.69 and 3.00, respectively; p < 0.001). The joint PM 2.5 –NDVI interaction was also significant (EDF = 6.70, p < 0.001), indicating that estimated disease risk varied across combined exposure profiles. HIA estimates were scenario-dependent; the more intensive joint-improvement scenario produced the largest model-estimated burden reduction, with a joint population attributable fraction of 4.75% (95% CI: 4.65–4.84). The findings support considering correlated environmental exposures when evaluating coordinated air-quality and greenness strategies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Guo et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: