Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Experimental study demonstrates substantial scour reduction around cylindrical monopiles using double-layer collars, indicating strong potential for safeguarding offshore wind turbine foundations.
Local scour around offshore wind monopiles can reduce foundation embedment and threaten long-term structural performance. This study experimentally investigates single-, double-, and triple-layer collar systems under steady clear-water currents, with emphasis on the effects of collar width, elevation, vertical arrangement, layer number, and flow intensity. The main test matrix is conducted at a flow intensity of 0.8, while representative single- and double-collar configurations are additionally tested at flow intensities of 0.7 and 0.9. Quasi-equilibrium bed topographies are reconstructed and evaluated using the maximum scour depth, scour area, and scour volume. For the unprotected monopile at a flow intensity of 0.8, the dimensionless maximum scour depth, area and volume are 0.86, 5.62 and 2.47, respectively. A 24 cm bed-attached single-collar reduces these values to 0.18, 0.32, and 0.03, whereas its effectiveness decreases rapidly when the collar is elevated. The best double-collar configuration consists of a 24 cm-wide bed-attached lower collar and a 12 cm-wide upper collar separated vertically by 2.5 cm. It reduces the three indicators to 0.15, 0.18, and 0.01, corresponding to reductions of 82.6%, 96.8%, and 99.6%. A bed-attached triple-collar system provides comparable, but not superior, protection. Across flow intensities of 0.7-0.9, the representative double-collar system retains depth-, area-, and volume-reduction efficiencies of 78.8%-82.9%, 94.5%-96.8%, and 92.0%-99.6%, respectively. The results identify the lower-collar elevation and width as the primary design parameters, while upper collars provide supplementary control of residual scour.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: