Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Cohort study demonstrates enzymatic calibration for molar ceruloplasmin quantification in clinical samples, highlighting an accurate alternative to immunoassays for copper assessment.
OBJECTIVES: Ceruloplasmin (Cp) and non-ceruloplasmin-bound copper (NCC) are measured when evaluating liver disease and disorders of copper (Cu) metabolism. Cp mass concentration is typically determined by immunoassays that detect both apo- and holoceruloplasmin. In contrast, enzymatic assays measure Cp ferroxidase activity and are therefore specific for holoceruloplasmin. Their clinical use has been limited by the absence of a method to convert enzyme activity to molar Cp concentration and to estimate NCC. METHODS: Cp ferroxidase activity and serum Cu concentrations were measured in a training dataset (n=924) to define their linear relationship and derive a conversion factor based on the stoichiometry of six Cu atoms per Cp molecule. This factor was applied to an independent validation cohort (n=12,635). Cp activity, Cp mass concentration, and serum Cu were compared, and reference intervals for Cp activity and NCC were established. RESULTS: The calibration of Cp activity assay against Cu concentration yielded a conversion factor of 0.0030 for expressing Cp activity in molar units. Reference intervals for Cp activity were 1.5-3.7 μmol/L in males and 1.6-4.3 μmol/L in females. Comparison with nephelometric Cp measurements demonstrated a positive bias and evidence of analytical interference in a subset of samples. CONCLUSIONS: We describe a method to convert Cp ferroxidase activity to molar concentration and demonstrate its application in a large clinical cohort. This approach enables estimation of NCC, although with considerable uncertainty, and establishment of reference intervals using activity-based measurements. Measurement of Cp by enzymatic activity provides a cost-effective and analytically robust alternative to immunoassays, with advantages in specificity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kane et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: