Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Hydrological study reveals directional propagation across multi-type droughts in the Yellow River source region, suggesting groundwater metrics significantly enhance surface water forecasting.
Existing studies often identify drought propagation time using correlation analysis or fixed-lag methods, which makes it difficult to reveal directional predictive relationships among drought types and to assess the stability and uncertainty of lagged response windows. To address these gaps, this study focuses on the Yellow River source region. Based on the spatiotemporal evolution of groundwater drought, directional prediction tests and Bootstrap-based lag window identification were used to examine the propagation direction and response time among Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI), Standardized Runoff Index (SRI), and Drought Severity Index (DSI), with Pearson lagged correlation used for supplementary validation. The results show that: (1) the estimated groundwater storage anomalies (GWSA) agrees well with in-situ groundwater observations, and groundwater drought in the Yellow River source region showed clear stage-wise and spatial differences during 2003–2022, shifting from nearly drought-free conditions to more frequent and severe droughts; (2) clear directional predictive relationships and distinct lagged responses exist among different drought types, and historical groundwater drought information can significantly improve the prediction of surface water drought; and (3) meteorological and surface water droughts show a relatively synchronous lagged response, whereas surface water and groundwater droughts exhibit clear asynchronous changes during the study period.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: