Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Computational audit reveals insufficient evidence to operationalize protocol constructs in panel survey data, indicating strict boundaries on analytical validity.
This report documents the v1.0.31 computational audit of the Organic Intelligence Protocol (OIP) against the Malawi Integrated Household Panel Survey (IHPS) 2010–2019 dataset. The audit processed 395 Stata files and applied an evidence-first, fail-closed methodology. Required evidence for operationalizing the documented GFL, IDS, and AML constructs was not sufficient, so analytical cohort construction and scoring were not authorized. The report documents the resulting evidence boundary and does not claim predictive, causal, universal, or commercial validity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sudharsan Das (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: