In vitro study shows seating load primarily determines film thickness in light-cure veneer cements, suggesting shear-thinning properties aid seating under reduced force.
This article aims to evaluate the shear rate-dependent rheological behavior of light-cure resin cements used for lithium disilicate veneers and assess its relationship with cement film thickness under standardized and clinically relevant seating loads. Five light-cure resin cements (RXV, CVE, ACV, NXL, and VLE) were tested using rotational rheometry under a standardized baseline gap. Apparent viscosity (η) was determined at 10 s−1 and 100 s−1. Cement film thickness was measured following ISO 4049 under 150 N and under reduced loads of 50 and 30 N. All measurements were performed in triplicate (n = 3 per cement for rheology; n = 3 per cement per seating load for film thickness). Data were analyzed using one-way and two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by Tukey post hoc tests where appropriate. Linear regression and Pearson's correlation analyses were used to examine load-film thickness trends and viscosity-film thickness associations. The significance level was set at α = 0.05. Viscosity differed significantly among materials at both shear rates (p < 0.001). At 10 s−1, viscosity ranged from 210 ± 2 Pa·s (VLE) to 1820 ± 20 Pa·s (NXL), while at 100 s−1 it ranged from 164 ± 2 Pa·s (RXV) to 440 ± 2 Pa·s (VLE). Four cements showed pronounced shear-thinning behavior (−82.6% to −86.3%), whereas VLE showed an inverse response (-109.5%). Film thickness differed significantly across all seating loads (150 N: p = 0.004; 50 and 30 N: p < 0.001). At 30 N, values ranged from 48.3 ± 3.5 µm (RXV) to 74.7 ± 2.5 µm (NXL). Weak positive associations were observed between viscosity and film thickness under reduced seating conditions (r = 0.25 at 30 N; r = 0.24 at 50 N). Seating load was the main determinant of cement film thickness, while shear rate-dependent viscosity showed a secondary, material-dependent contribution under reduced pressure. Favorable shear-thinning behavior may support improved seating adaptation and more consistent film thickness control during veneer placement.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Randa Sabry Ibrahim (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: