Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Narrative review uncovers dual responses to climate threat in social groups, highlighting how psychological threat defense can either fuel intergroup conflict or motivate collective climate action.
Climate change is discussed as a global security risk, eliciting intergroup conflict. While this has often been attributed to increasing realistic intergroup conflict over natural resources becoming scarcer, more recent research suggests a complementary and catalytic psychological process of automatic threat defense. According to group-based control theory, people respond to threat by increased identification with agentic ingroups and group-based action. Thus, reflecting on threatening climate change can lead to attitudes and behavior that trigger and catalyze intergroup conflict. At the same time, increased group-based motivation may drive people to contribute to collective goal attainment, such as collective climate action. We review this emerging research line and discuss implications for climate-related intergroup conflict and the possibility of collective climate action.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fritsche et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: