Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Computational modeling demonstrates optimized multi-objective schedule generation in non-unit repetitive construction, highlighting improved trade-offs across cost, duration, and crew continuity.
Non-unit repetitive construction projects, in which activity groups are repeatedly executed over work-group-specific units rather than over a common set of identical production units, are difficult to schedule because activity sequences, crew movements, and execution logic vary across crew options. This study develops a multi-objective Constraint Programming–Satisfiability (CP-SAT) model for non-unit repetitive construction scheduling. The model integrates crew–option selection, interval-based scheduling, route-based crew logic, transfer-dependent travel times, optional interruption, and sequence control within a unified framework. Both soft and hard sequencing requirements are represented: soft sequences emerge from optimized crew routes, while hard sequences can enforce prescribed order, same-crew execution, and immediate-successor relationships when required. An exact ε-constraint procedure is used for the bi-objective time-cost case, while sampled frontier generation supports higher-dimensional trade-off analysis. From a practical perspective, the framework helps project managers compare feasible scheduling alternatives and balance competing priorities related to project deadlines, budget, construction quality, and crew continuity. The proposed model therefore provides a rigorous and practical decision-support framework for complex non-unit repetitive construction projects.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Luong Duc Long (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: