Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Comparative laboratory study reveals high surfactant removal by aquatic plants alongside notable biomass loss, suggesting trade-offs between treatment efficacy and plant survival.
Linear alkylbenzene sulfonate (LAS), a widely used anionic surfactant, can adversely affect aquatic systems. This study compared the LAS-removal performance of the floating macrophyte Lemna minor and the submerged macrophyte Hydrilla verticillata using a 3 × 3 factorial design (0, 20, and 40 ppm LAS; 0, 5, and 10 days; n = 3). After 10 days, both plant-associated systems removed more than 80% of LAS. L. minor achieved the highest observed removal (90.12% at 40 ppm), compared with 81.90% for H. verticillata, but this performance came at the cost of greater biomass loss. Biomass declined by approximately 28% in L. minor and 25% in H. verticillata at 40 ppm, and biomass was negatively associated with removal efficiency (Spearman ρ = −0.82 and −0.79, respectively; p < 0.05). Future work must incorporate abiotic/plant-free controls, increased replication, complete LAS mass balances, and analyses of microbial communities, biofilms, and transformation products, alongside mixed-species or staged systems. Validation using real detergent wastewater under flow-through or pilot-scale conditions is essential to assess treatment robustness, harvesting needs, and practical operational constraints.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wiratno et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: