Computational screening reveals viable 2D GeSe4 allotropes for solar overall water splitting, indicating reaction-level thermodynamic compatibility is critical for photocatalyst discovery.
Efficient solar hydrogen production through photocatalytic overall water splitting requires more than appropriate band gaps and favorable band-edge alignment, yet this requirement is often underestimated in computational screening of two-dimensional photocatalysts. Here, we combine USPEX global structural search and first-principles calculations to identify viable five-atom 2D M x Se y allotropes (M = Si, Ge, Sn; x + y = 5) for solar photocatalytic overall water splitting. Starting from 11,280 converged structures, 91 semiconducting monolayers were identified, among which 16 electronically promising allotropes were retained after HSE06 band-edge alignment and corrected solar-to-hydrogen efficiency screening. Family-wide analysis shows that Se-rich stoichiometries and low-symmetry surface-inequivalent allotropes enlarge the pool of potential candidates by promoting intrinsic polarity, band-edge charge separation, and anisotropic carrier transport. However, these favorable electronic features do not by themselves ensure overall-water-splitting feasibility. The decisive factor is the thermodynamic compatibility of hydrogen and oxygen evolution within a common pH window, followed by structural robustness under operating conditions. Under this reaction-level screening framework, GeSe 4 -4 emerges as the most viable candidate, operating within pH 3–5 with a predicted corrected solar-to-hydrogen efficiency of 17.41–20.86%, which can be further increased to 22.10% under + 4% biaxial tensile strain. Phonon calculations and ab initio molecular dynamics simulations, including solvent-assisted simulations, further support its stability. These results establish composition-structure–reactivity criteria for identifying viable 2D photocatalysts for solar hydrogen production and clarify why many electronically attractive candidates fail at the reaction level.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: