Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Bibliometric analysis reveals substantial scholar displacement from conflict-affected Ukrainian regions after 2014, highlighting how armed conflict disrupts and reorganizes national science systems.
Current migration theories occasionally ignore the potentially negative aspects of scholarly migration as a form of high‐skilled migration, largely viewing it in a positive light. Yet scholarly migration is not always a tale of freedom and innovation, as the labels “researchers at risk” and “scientists in exile” demonstrate. We document the problematic aspects of conflict‐related scholarly migration among researchers with Ukraine‐affiliated publication histories from 2009 to 2022. We primarily draw on OpenAlex bibliometric records to reconstruct affiliation‐based migration histories and aggregate them to Ukraine's first‐level administrative regions. Results suggest that after 2014 there was substantial internal and international out‐migration from the occupied Eastern Ukrainian regions as well as the annexed Crimean peninsula, with over 50 per 1,000 scholars leaving the Eastern regions to both internal and international destinations and over 100 per 1,000 scholars out‐migrating from Crimea to international destinations in the first three years after the start of the conflict in 2014. These results show how armed conflict can be associated with a reorganization of national science systems by changing where researchers work and publish, thereby calling into question accounts that treat scholarly mobility primarily as voluntary high‐skilled migration.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zaslavsky et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: