Theoretical analysis derives the Yang–Mills mass gap and proton radius using geometric topology, indicating solutions to fundamental quantum problems and cosmological tensions.
We derive the Yang–Mills mass gap geometrically from the static 12×12×12 tessellation of the General Theory (TG): Δ_QCD = (P_s P_d / 12) m₂ ≃ 1.478 GeV (0.3σ agreement with experimental glueball data). The same discrete systolic architecture (so(12) ⊕ so(7) ⊕ so(7) → so(26)) resolves the proton radius puzzle (r_p = 0.8769 fm), shows that the Clay Mathematics Institute formulation is incomplete for a discrete substrate, and dissolves multiple ΛCDM tensions (Hubble, S₈, early massive galaxies, lithium, dark-energy dynamics, Axis of Evil) without exotic particles or forces. Redshift is a metric effect of the future evolution of P_s; nucleosynthesis is exclusively stellar; the true age of the cosmos is ∼8.75×10¹⁸ yr. The framework predicts a natural cutoff at 13.7 TeV (L5s monopole) and anisotropy of the speed of light (experimental data forthcoming). All parameters are fixed by the fine-structure constant and a documented thermometric correction to the absolute temperature scale.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jorge Luiz Silva de Barcellos (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: