Perspective describes AI-induced attentional displacement in clinical diagnosis, highlighting how automated summaries divert focus from critical patient findings.
PREPRINT — This manuscript has not undergone peer review. A version of this manuscript is currently under consideration by the Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association (JAMIA). Objective: To describe artificial intelligence-induced attentional displacement (AIIAD) as a proposed mechanism affecting clinical diagnosis. Perspective: AI-mediated selection, summarisation, ranking, and framing may shift attention away from patient history, examination, and discordant findings, even without explicit acceptance of an AI recommendation. A published patient-facing chatbot case illustrates the concern but does not establish the mechanism in clinicians. AIIAD overlaps with automation bias, attentional tunneling, misplaced salience, anchoring, and premature closure; its independent explanatory value remains unproven. Implications: Evaluation should examine the combined clinician-system workflow and changes in attention, information seeking, and diagnostic reconsideration. Source visibility, preservation of high-consequence clues, independent differential formation, and diagnostic pauses warrant prospective evaluation. AI should extend clinical attention rather than appropriate it.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stanley Clark Newhall (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: