Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Cross-sectional survey reveals inconsistent substance use programming and persistent implementation barriers among school administrators, highlighting the need for national evidence-based guidance.
Background Despite decades of research on school-based substance use prevention, a persistent gap exists between evidence and practice. Understanding current programs and barriers to evidence-based approaches is essential for systems transformation.Methods A national cross-sectional survey was conducted with 204 Canadian K-12 school administrators (principals, vice-principals) between June and September 2024, recruited through professional associations.Results Schools employed heterogeneous programming; MADD (33.5%), DARE (26.1%), and Safer Schools Together (18.6%) were most common, while 11.7% reported no programs. Many administrators endorsed relationship-building practices alongside zero-tolerance policies. Familiarity with evidence-based approaches was limited; fewer than half reported alignment with equity-oriented approaches, stigma reduction, harm reduction, or upstream prevention. Nearly all identified practice-change barriers, most commonly insufficient professional development resources (50%), lack of a guiding framework (48%), and limited access to trained professionals (44%).Conclusions Canadian schools have inconsistent substance use programming with limited alignment to evidence-based frameworks, though administrators expressed willingness to lead change. Addressing systemic barriers through accessible professional development, national guidance, and policy coherence is essential to bridge the evidence-practice gap and improve student outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Molyneux et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: