Key result
Peri-pulmonary vein fat radiomics strongly outperform fat attenuation index in distinguishing AF from sinus rhythm.
Why the study?
It was hypothesized that fat radiomic profiles (FRP) around the pulmonary veins, left atrium, and left atrial appendage could help identify AF and assess recurrence risk.
Does fat radiomic profile (FRP) from coronary CT angiography improve the identification of atrial fibrillation and prediction of post-ablation recurrence compared to fat attenuation index (FAI)?
Observational (n=300)
Does fat radiomic profile (FRP) from coronary CT angiography improve the identification of atrial fibrillation and prediction of post-ablation recurrence compared to fat attenuation index (FAI)?
Effect estimate: AUC 0.961
Fat radiomic profiles from epicardial fat around pulmonary veins, left atrium, and left atrial appendage derived from coronary CT angiography significantly outperform fat attenuation index in identifying atrial fibrillation and predicting post-ablation recurrence.
May support AF identification on CCTA; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before clinical use.
OBJECTIVES: Fat radiomic profile (FRP) was a promising imaging biomarker for identifying increased cardiac risk. We hypothesize FRP can be extended to fat regions around pulmonary veins (PV), left atrium (LA), and left atrial appendage (LAA) to investigate their usefulness in identifying atrial fibrillation (AF) and the risk of AF recurrence. METHODS: We analysed 300 individuals and grouped patients according to the occurrence and types of AF. We used receiver operating characteristic and survival curves analyses to evaluate the value of imaging biomarkers, including fat attenuation index (FAI) and FRP, in distinguishing AF from sinus rhythm and predicting post-ablation recurrence. RESULTS: FRPs from AF-relevant fat regions showed significant performance in distinguishing AF and non-AF with higher AUC values than FAI (peri-PV: FRP = 0.961 vs FAI = 0.579, peri-LA: FRP = 0.923 vs FAI = 0.575, peri-LAA: FRP = 0.900 vs FAI = 0.665). FRPs from peri-PV, peri-LA, and peri-LAA were able to differentiate persistent and paroxysmal AF with AUC values of 0.804, 0.819, and 0.694. FRP from these regions improved AF recurrence prediction with an AUC of 0.929, 0.732, and 0.794. Patients with FRP cut-off values of ≥0.16, 0.38, and 0.26 had a 7.22-, 5.15-, and 4.25-fold higher risk of post-procedure recurrence, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: FRP demonstrated potential in identifying AF, distinguishing AF types, and predicting AF recurrence risk after ablation. FRP from peri-PV fat depot exhibited a strong correlation with AF. Therefore, evaluating epicardial fat using FRP was a promising approach to enhance AF clinical management. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: The role of epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) in AF had been confirmed, we focussed on the relationship between EAT around pulmonary arteries and LAA in AF which was still unknown. Meanwhile, we used the FRP to excavate more information of EAT in AF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wu et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Atrial fibrillation (n=300). Fat radiomic profile (FRP) vs. Fat attenuation index (FAI) was evaluated on Distinguishing AF and non-AF (AUC 0.961). Fat radiomic profiles from peri-pulmonary vein regions distinguished atrial fibrillation from sinus rhythm better than fat attenuation index (AUC 0.961 vs 0.579).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: