Key result
Online Clinical Frailty Scale tutorial garners ~93% user satisfaction alongside high feasibility and effectiveness.
Why the study?
Practice guidelines recommend routine frailty screening because frailty predicts adverse outcomes in older people, but screening does not occur regularly.
Does an online training module for the Clinical Frailty Scale improve user satisfaction, effectiveness, and feasibility?
Observational (n=627)
Does an online training module for the Clinical Frailty Scale improve user satisfaction, effectiveness, and feasibility?
An online tutorial for the Clinical Frailty Scale is feasible, effective, and highly rated by users, supporting its use for training in frailty assessment.
May support online frailty scale training in practice; leaves open whether ratings improve assessment accuracy or outcomes.
INTRODUCTION: Frailty is a robust predictor of adverse outcomes in older people. Practice guidelines recommend routine screening for frailty; however, this does not occur regularly. The Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) is a validated, feasible instrument that can be used in a variety of clinical settings and is associated with many adverse outcomes. Our objective was to develop and evaluate an online training module to guide frailty assessment using the CFS. METHODS: A multidisciplinary team of clinical experts developed an evidence-based, theory-grounded online training module for users who wished to perform frailty assessment using the CFS. The module was prospectively evaluated for user satisfaction, effectiveness and feasibility using a standardised questionnaire. Qualitative feedback was analysed with thematic analysis. RESULTS: Version 1 of the CFS module was used 627 times from 21 October 2019 to 24 March 2020. Satisfaction, effectiveness and feasibility of the module were positively rated (≥4/5 on a 5-point Likert scale n = 582 [93%], n = 507, [81%], n = 575, [91%], respectively). Qualitative feedback highlighted ease of use, likelihood of users to share the module with others and opportunities to increase multimedia content. CONCLUSION: An online tutorial, designed using evidence and theory to guide frailty assessment using the CFS, was positively rated by users. The module's content and structure was rated effective and feasible, and users were satisfied with, and likely to share, the module. Research evaluating the module's impact on the accuracy of frailty assessment is required.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mulpuru et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Frailty (n=627). Online Clinical Frailty Scale tutorial was evaluated on User satisfaction, effectiveness and feasibility. An online Clinical Frailty Scale tutorial was positively rated by users for satisfaction (93%), feasibility (91%), and effectiveness (81%).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: