Key result
Review highlights new international methods and simulators for evaluating noninvasive blood pressure monitors.
Why the study?
Methods and simulators for evaluating noninvasive blood pressure monitors had developed dynamically, warranting an update complementary to a previous review.
Provides an update on recent developments in methods and simulators for evaluating noninvasive blood pressure monitors.
No immediate change to NIBP validation practices; leaves open the utility of new international simulators.
The development of methods and simulators for evaluating noninvasive blood pressure (NIBP) monitors has been dynamic during the past few years. As a complement to a previous review paper in this journal, several additional developments are reported in this paper. These include evaluation methods developed in Australia, the United States and Europe, as well as NIBP simulators developed in Germany and the United States.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ng et al. (1994) conducted a review in Noninvasive blood pressure monitoring. Methods and simulators for evaluating noninvasive blood pressure monitors was evaluated. Recent developments in methods and simulators for evaluating noninvasive blood pressure monitors include new evaluation methods from Australia, the US, and Europe, and simulators from Germany and the US.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: