Key result
Lower socioeconomic status is linked to a disproportionately high burden of congenital heart diseases.
Why the study?
Socioeconomic factors play an important role in shaping inequality in congenital heart diseases, motivating an assessment and decomposition of socioeconomic inequality in congenital heart diseases in Iran.
Cross-Sectional (n=600)
No
Effect estimate: ECI -0.65 (95% CI -0.72 to -0.58)
There is substantial socioeconomic inequality in congenital heart diseases in Iran, largely driven by family socioeconomic status, mother's occupation, access to pregnancy care, and folic acid use.
May inform equity-focused prenatal policies; leaves open causal pathways and intervention trials for congenital heart disease disparities.
INTRODUCTION: Social-economic factors have an important role in shaping inequality in congenital heart diseases. The current study aimed to assess and decompose the socio-economic inequality in Congenital Heart Diseases (CHDs) in Iran. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional research conducted at Shahid Rajaie Cardiovascular Medical and Research Center in Tehran, Iran, as one of the largest referral heart hospitals in Asia. Data were collected primarily from 600 mothers who attended in pediatric cardiology department in 2020. The polychoric principal component analysis (PCA) and Errygers corrected CI (ECI) were used to construct household socioeconomic status and to assess inequality in CHDs, respectively. A regression-based decomposition analysis was also applied to explain socioeconomic-related inequalities. To select the explanatory social, medical/biological, and lifestyle variables, the chi-square test was first used. RESULTS: There was a significant pro-rich inequality in CHDs (ECI = -0.65, 95% CI, - 0.72 to - 0.58). The social, medical/biological, and lifestyle variables accounted for 51.47, 43.25, and 3.92% of inequality in CHDs, respectively. Among the social variables, family SES (about 50%) and mother's occupation (21.05%) contributed the most to CHDs' inequality. Besides, in the medical/biological group, receiving pregnancy care (22.06%) and using acid folic (15.70%) had the highest contribution. CONCLUSION: We concluded that Iran suffers from substantial socioeconomic inequality in CHDs that can be predominantly explained by social and medical/biological variables. It seems that distributional policies aim to reduce income inequality while increasing access of prenatal care and folic acid for disadvantaged mothers could address this inequality much more strongly in Iran.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Amini‐Rarani et al. (2021) conducted a cross-sectional in Congenital Heart Diseases (n=600). Socioeconomic status vs. Higher socioeconomic status was evaluated on Socioeconomic inequality in congenital heart diseases (Errygers corrected Concentration Index) (ECI -0.65, 95% CI -0.72 to -0.58). Lower socioeconomic status demonstrated a significant pro-rich inequality in congenital heart diseases (ECI -0.65), indicating the disease is disproportionately concentrated among disadvantaged families.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: