Key result
Type D personality linked to ~2x higher rates of essential hypertension in primary care.
Why the study?
Is type D personality associated with essential hypertension in primary care patients?
Case-Control (n=239)
Is type D personality associated with essential hypertension in primary care patients?
Type D personality is significantly associated with essential hypertension in primary care patients, highlighting a potential psychological risk factor for hypertension.
May flag Type D personality in primary care hypertension assessment; leaves open causality and intervention effects.
To estimate the relationship between type D personality and essential hypertension among patients visiting their GPs for any health problem, 101 hypertensive and 138 nonhypertensive patients were consecutively recruited and assessed using the Type D Personality Scale (DS14). The predictive value of type D personality was determined using a logistic regression model, taking into account the differences in recognized confounders between groups. Type D personality in the hypertension group was twice as frequent as in the no hypertension group and hypertension was more frequent among type D than non-type D patients. Logistic regression showed a significant predictive value of type D personality for hypertension, adjusting for sex, age, body mass index, family history of hypertension, living condition, education, and employment. Therefore, type D personality was strongly related to hypertension and it was a noteworthy predictor of hypertension in a real-world cohort of primary care patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Oliva et al. (2015) conducted a case-control in Essential Hypertension (n=239). Type D personality vs. Non-type D personality was evaluated on Essential hypertension. Type D personality was a significant predictor of essential hypertension in primary care patients, occurring twice as frequently in hypertensive patients compared to nonhypertensive patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: