Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Photobiomodulation (PBM), previously termed low-level light (laser) therapy (LLLT), has been receiving tremendous attention in the prevention and treatment of various brain disorders, including neurodegenerative diseases, brain injuries, and psychiatric disorders (Hamblin, 2019;Wu et al., 2022;Yang et al., 2022;Chen et al., 2024). PBM therapy, a light-based, non-invasive approach, involves the application of low levels of visible light with a wavelength between 400-720 nm or near-infrared light with a wavelength around 700-1100 nm on biological tissues to regulate biological effects. A large body of research shows that cytochrome c oxidase (CCO) in the mitochondria has been the primary target of PBM. PBM could enhance mitochondrial function by promoting nitric oxide (NO) photodissociation from CCO, thereby increasing CCO activity.However, in recent years, there has been growing debate over whether CCO is indeed the primary target of PBM (Sommer, 2019b;a). Additionally, many questions regarding the application of PBM in the treatment of brain disorders remain to be addressed, including light source parameters, irradiation dosage, treatment location, optimal irradiation protocols, and clinical translation. This research topic aims to collect studies on the latest advances in PBM modulation on brain disorders, summarizing the most recent findings and uncovering novel discoveries regarding the biological mechanisms of PBM. We aim to highlight the promising therapeutic potential in various brain disorders, its protective mechanisms, laser application treatment regimens, and its clinical translational significance. This research topic includes four publications: one clinical trial, one study protocol, one policy and practice review, and one review article. These articles provide valuable insights and practical approaches for applying PBM therapy in the treatment of various brain disorders and emphasize the importance of optimizing PBM parameters, such as light penetration, energy delivered, and delivery methods, to maximize its efficacy.Although increasing evidence supports the neuroprotective effects of PBM in various brain disorders, the beneficial effects of PBM depend on several illumination parameters, including wavelength, light penetration, plus frequency, power density, energy delivered, scatter, refraction, and coherence. However, the disagreement on light/laser source parameters significantly affects the translation from animal research findings to clinical applications. Among these parameters, the penetration of the light/laser source is an essential factor influencing the photonic energy delivered to the targeted tissue. In a policy and practice review of our current research topic, Henderson emphasizes that although emerging commercial products and studies claim therapeutic benefits to patients with low-power devices, the light cannot adequately penetrate the human scalp and skull.In this review, Henderson examines the penetration of infrared light in the treatment of human brain disorders and discusses the penetration of infrared light through specific tissues and heterogeneous tissues in transcranial PBM. In addition, this review suggests that PBM, when applied using a low-power infrared device that doesn't illuminate the target neurons with sufficient fluence, may still exert beneficial effects through systemic mechanisms rather than direct action on neuronal mitochondria in brain disorders. Following Henderson's review, it's evident that the successful application of PBM depends on the careful design of clinical studies, which need to consider various illumination parameters.With this regard, another contribution to our research topic provides valuable insight into the application of PBM in Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients. In this protocol, Yokoi et al. outline a well-structured approach to assessing the efficacy and safety of PBM in this population. The trial design involves a single-center, parallel-group, randomized, sham-controlled study, where AD patients receive either sham or active stimulation for 20 min per session for 12 weeks. The stimulation is delivered using invisible near-infrared light through a combination of applicators placed in the nostril and scalp, targeting both frontal and occipital regions. By measuring outcomes such as cognitive function and caregiver burden, this protocol will provide critical data on the potential therapeutic benefits of PBM in AD, addressing both the efficacy of the treatment and its practicality in a home setting.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wu et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: