Key result
Dialysis nonadherence is linked to ~56% more hospitalizations, lower adequacy, and greater interdialytic weight gain.
Why the study?
Dialysis nonadherence among Saudi hemodialysis patients had not been studied previously.
What is the prevalence of dialysis nonadherence and does it affect clinical outcomes in Saudi hemodialysis patients?
Observational (n=265)
No
What is the prevalence of dialysis nonadherence and does it affect clinical outcomes in Saudi hemodialysis patients?
Absolute Event Rate: 50% vs 32%
p-value: p=0.01
Dialysis nonadherence is highly prevalent among Saudi patients and is significantly associated with lower dialysis adequacy, higher interdialytic weight gain, and increased hospitalization rates.
Supports monitoring for nonadherence in Saudi hemodialysis; leaves open whether interventions improve outcomes.
Dialysis nonadherence among Saudi hemodialysis (HD) patients has not been studied previously. We study its prevalence, causes, and consequences. All chronic HD patients at our center were enrolled. Their demographics as well as levels of hemoglobin (Hb), Kt/v, potassium, and phosphate; dialysis type; dialysis vintage; duration; and shift were recorded. Nonadherence, defined as missed dialysis session or patient-derived shortening of the dialysis session by >10 min at least once over a month's period, was recorded. We analyzed the relationship of nonadherence to emergency room visits, hospitalizations, interdialytic weight gain (IDWG), intradialytic symptoms, home-to-hospital distance, and smoking habits. Two hundred and sixty-five patients were included; their mean age was 61.8 ± 18.2 years, 47.3% were male, dialysis vintage was 3.8 ± 3.3 years, 5.9% were on HD, and 34.1% were on hemodiafiltration. During the study period, the nonadherence rate was 25% for missed dialysis sessions and 72% for shortened dialysis on at least one occasion. Nonadherence was more likely to occur in males than females (75% and 66%, respectively, P = 0.05), in smokers (57.1% vs. 21.7%, P = 0.0003), and in night shifts rather than day shifts (33.6% vs. 20.6%, P = 0.042). Nonadherent patients had lower Kt/V than adherent patients (1.22 ± 0.2 and 1.31 ± 0.2, respectively P = 0.01), had higher mean IDWG (2.7 ± 1.0 and 2.4 ± 1.0 kg, respectively, P = 0.02), and are more likely to be hospitalized (50% vs. 32%, P = 0.01). On the other hand, no differences were observed in serum phosphate, potassium, or Hb levels; intradialytic symptoms; education; employment; the distance between the dialysis unit and home; type of dialysis; Charlson Comorbidity Index; or the dialysis vintage. The prevalence of nonadherence in our group was comparable to that of other reports and is more likely to occur in male patients, smokers, and those in night shifts. It is associated with lower dialysis adequacy, higher mean IDWG, and higher hospitalization rate.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sayyari et al. (2019) conducted an observational in Chronic hemodialysis (n=265). Dialysis nonadherence vs. Adherence was evaluated on Hospitalization (p=0.01). Dialysis nonadherence was associated with a higher hospitalization rate compared to adherence (50% vs. 32%, P=0.01), as well as lower dialysis adequacy and higher interdialytic weight gain.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: