Key result
Rapid atrial pacing at 80 bpm cuts AF recurrence ~44% vs 60 bpm in brady-tachy syndrome.
Why the study?
Does rapid atrial pacing at 80 bpm reduce atrial fibrillation recurrence compared to 60 bpm pacing in patients with symptomatic brady-tachy syndrome?
RCT (n=30)
Crossover
Does rapid atrial pacing at 80 bpm reduce atrial fibrillation recurrence compared to 60 bpm pacing in patients with symptomatic brady-tachy syndrome?
Absolute Event Rate: 31% vs 55.2%
p-value: p=< 0.05
Rapid atrial pacing at 80 bpm significantly reduces and delays atrial fibrillation recurrence compared to 60 bpm pacing in patients with symptomatic brady-tachy syndrome.
Supports 80-bpm base-rate programming in symptomatic brady-tachy syndrome; extends RCT evidence for AF prevention via atrial pacing.
AIMS: Recent studies have tested different atrial pacing rates, modes, and sites for preventing atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence. Present generation pacemakers offer reliable electrograms (EGMs) storage for optimizing the arrhythmia diagnosis. Based on these EGMs, the study objective was to assess the rate of AF recurrence at two different pacing rates. METHODS: Thirty patients suffering exclusively from symptomatic brady-tachy syndrome (BTS) resistant to > or =2 drugs, were implanted with a DDDR pacemaker. After a 5-days observation period, the DDD pacing rate was randomly programmed at 60 bpm (-15 bpm hysteresis) or at 80 bpm for 12 weeks. The two sequences were crossed over at the end of this fixed period or when earlier symptomatic AF recurred. Antiarrhythmics were maintained. Stored EGMs of > or =4 s duration identified all AF recurrence. RESULTS: Thirty patients (17 males, 77.2 +/- 8.1 years old) were included. One patient withdrew prematurely for severe heart failure associated with AF recurrence and rapid ventricular response. For the remainder of the 29 patients, fast atrial pacing neither provoked symptoms nor haemodynamic change. AF recurred in 16 patients paced at 60 (-15) bpm (mean time: 29 days; range 1-61) and in 9 patients paced at 80 bpm (mean time: 55 days; range 5-83) (P < 0.05). AF recurrence was asymptomatic in 50% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: These results confirm that rapid atrial pacing is 1) significantly effective for preventing AF recurrence in symptomatic BTS patients, and 2) haemodynamically well tolerated.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Flammang et al. (2005) conducted an RCT in Symptomatic brady-tachy syndrome (BTS) (n=30). Rapid atrial pacing vs. Pacing at 60 bpm (-15 bpm hysteresis) was evaluated on Atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence (p=< 0.05). Rapid atrial pacing at 80 bpm significantly reduced atrial fibrillation recurrence compared to 60 bpm in patients with symptomatic brady-tachy syndrome (31.0% vs 55.2%; P<0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: