Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
PURPOSE: To explore the application effect of the technique of "priority dissecting of the inferior mesenteric artery combined with complete medial approach (IMA-CMA)" in laparoscopic left-sided colon cancer radical resection. METHODS: A total of 99 patients who underwent laparoscopic left-sided colon cancer radical resection with splenic flexure mobilization between September 2021 to May 2023 were included. Sixty-eight of these patients were analyzed after propensity score matching (PSM). The perioperative characteristics were compared. RESULTS: Among these enrolled patients, 45 underwent the traditional approach, and 54 underwent IMA-CMA approach. After PSM, the patients were matched to include 34 patients in each group, with no significant differences in the sex (p = 0.618) or location of tumor (p = 0.798) between the two groups. The patients in IMA-CMA group had shorter operating time (p = 0.032), less intraoperative blood loss (p = 0.003), a higher number of harvested lymph nodes (p = 0.044) and center group lymph nodes(p = 0.037), and a shorter postoperative hospital stay (p = 0.011). Number of positive lymph nodes and postoperative complications were not significantly different between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: The technique of IMA-CMA for splenic flexure mobilization is safe and feasible. It can reduce operating time, intraoperative blood loss and postoperative hospital stay, which is conducive to achieving a thorough D3 lymphadenectomy without increasing the incidence of perioperative complications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: