Key result
Novel 1-D NRDPWT ECG compression improves percentage root mean square difference by ~15% versus SPIHT.
Why the study?
Does the novel 1-D NRDPWT-based ECG data compression method improve PRD compared to the SPIHT scheme in the MIT-BIH arrhythmia database?
Does the novel 1-D NRDPWT-based ECG data compression method improve PRD compared to the SPIHT scheme in the MIT-BIH arrhythmia database?
The proposed 1-D NRDPWT-based ECG data compression method significantly improves signal reconstruction quality (PRD) compared to the SPIHT scheme at various compression ratios.
Offers a theoretical framework for improving ECG data storage and transmission; leaves open whether this computational efficiency translates to.
In this paper, a novel electrocardiogram (ECG) data compression method with full wavelet coefficients is proposed. Full wavelet coefficients involve a mean value in the termination level and the wavelet coefficients of all octaves. This new approach is based on the reversible round-off nonrecursive one-dimensional (1-D) discrete periodized wavelet transform (1-D NRDPWT), which performs overall stages decomposition with minimum register word length and resists truncation error propagation. A nonlinear word length reduction algorithm with high compression ratio (CR) is also developed. This algorithm supplies high and low octave coefficients with small and large decimal quantization scales, respectively. This quantization process can be performed without an extra divider. The two performance parameters, CR and percentage root mean square difference (PRD), are evaluated using the MIT-BIH arrhythmia database. Compared with the SPIHT scheme, the PRD is improved by 14.95% for 4 < or = CR < or = 12 and 17.6% for 14 < or = CR < or = 20.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ku et al. (2006) studied Arrhythmia. Novel ECG data compression method based on 1-D NRDPWT vs. SPIHT scheme was evaluated on Percentage root mean square difference (PRD) and compression ratio (CR). The novel ECG data compression method based on 1-D NRDPWT improved the percentage root mean square difference by 14.95% for CR 4-12 and 17.6% for CR 14-20 compared with the SPIHT scheme.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: