Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The synthesis and structure of O-alkylated tetrahydroxy[3.1.3.1]metacyclophanes are described. 6,13,22,29-Tetra-tert-butyl-9,16,25,32-tetrahydroxy[3.1.3.1] metacyclophane 3 was tetra-O-alkylated with alkyl bromides (RBr: R = Et, Pr and Bu) in the presence of Cs 2 CO 3 to yield one pure stereoisomer in each case (i.e. the 1,4-alternate conformer) 5b–d as a major product; other possible isomers were not observed. Ring inversion by oxygen-through-the-annulus rotation is allowed for tetraethoxy and tetrapropoxy derivatives 5b,c (for 5c; coalescence temperature ca. 90 °C) but inhibited for the tetrabutoxy derivative 5d. In contrast, alkyl halides having larger alkyl groups than ethyl afforded poor yields of the corresponding tetra-O-alkylated compounds 5 although a significant amount of 1,3-di-O-substitution products 4 resulted when NaH was used as a base. On the other hand, the tetraol 3 was tetra-O-alkylated with benzyl bromide in the presence of NaH to yield exclusively the cone conformer cone-5f in quantitative yield. Only when the cation-π interactions between the alkali-metal cations and the π-electrons of the benzyl group(s) are able to hold the latter and the oxide group(s) on the same side of the [3.1.3.1]MCP is the conformation immobilized to the cone. The template effect of the sodium cation plays an important role in this benzylation. The 1 H NMR spectral behaviour of these macrocyclic metacyclophanes is also discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yamato et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: