Key result
RT3D-TTE guidance linked to ~50% shorter cath lab time versus 2D-TEE.
Why the study?
Does RT3D-TTE guidance improve procedural times compared to 2D-TEE guidance in patients undergoing ASO device closure of ASD?
Cohort (n=59)
Does RT3D-TTE guidance improve procedural times compared to 2D-TEE guidance in patients undergoing ASO device closure of ASD?
Absolute Event Rate: 39.1% vs 78.8%
p-value: p=<0.001
RT3D-TTE guidance for ASD closure is feasible, safe, and significantly reduces procedure times compared to standard 2D-TEE guidance.
RT3D-TTE guidance was associated with shorter cath lab times in ASD closure; leaves open need for randomized confirmation of safety and efficacy.
BACKGROUND: Transcatheter Amplatzer septal occluder (ASO) device closure of atrial septal defects (ASDs) has traditionally been guided by two-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography (2D-TEE) and intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) modalities. Real time three-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography (RT3D-TTE) provides rotating images to define ASD and adjacent structures with potential as an alternative to 2D-TEE or ICE for guiding the device closure of ASD. Our aim was to assess the feasibility and effectiveness of RT3D-TTE in parasternal four-chamber views to guide ASO device closure of ASD. METHODS AND RESULTS: From July 2004 to August 2005, 59 patients underwent transcatheter ASO device closure of ASD. The first 30 patients underwent 2D-TEE guidance under general anesthesia and the remaining 29 patients underwent RT3D-TTE guidance with local anesthesia. All interventions were successfully completed without complications. The clinical characteristics and transcatheter closure variables of RT3D-TTE and 2D-TEE were compared. Echocardiographic visualization of ASD and ASO deployment was found to be adequate when using either methods. Catheterization laboratory time (39.1 +/- 5.4 vs 78.8 +/- 14.1 minutes, P < 0.001) and interventional procedure length (7.6 +/- 4.2 vs 15.3 +/- 2.9 minutes, P < 0.001) were shortened by using RT3D-TTE as compared with 2DE-TEE. There was no difference in the rate of closure following either method, assessed after a 6-month follow-up. The maximal diameter measured by RT3D-TTE and 2D-TEE was correlated well with a balloon-stretched ASD size (y = 0.985x + 0.628, r = 0.924 vs y = 0.93x + 2.08, r = 0.885, respectively). CONCLUSION: RT3D-TTE may be a feasible, safe, and effective alternative to the standard practice of using 2D-TEE to guide ASO deployment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2006) conducted a cohort in Atrial septal defect (n=59). Real time three-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography (RT3D-TTE) vs. Two-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography (2D-TEE) was evaluated on Catheterization laboratory time (p=<0.001). Real time three-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography guidance significantly shortened catheterization laboratory time compared to 2D-TEE (39.1 vs 78.8 minutes, P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: