Key result
Premere system for long-channel PFO closure achieves ~99% long-term occlusion without complications.
Why the study?
Does the Premere Occlusion System effectively and safely close long-channel PFOs in patients with previous stroke?
Observational (n=70)
No
Does the Premere Occlusion System effectively and safely close long-channel PFOs in patients with previous stroke?
The Premere Occlusion System demonstrates high procedural success and mid-term occlusion rates with an excellent safety profile for transcatheter closure of long-channel PFOs without moderate/severe ASA.
Supports Premere for selected long-channel PFO without moderate/severe ASA; leaves open randomized trials versus rigid devices.
BACKGROUND: Transcatheter closure of patent foramen ovale (PFO) with rigid devices may be problematic in patients with long channel PFO: alternative devices with asymmetrical opening and more physiological positioning may be preferable in such cases. We present the mid-term results of transcatheter closure of PFO with Premere Occlusion System, a device studied for this specific anatomy, in a single-center registry of adults with previous cerebral ischemia. METHODS: During a 53-months period (July 1, 2005 to December 1, 2009) 70 patients (48 females and 22 males, mean age 38 ± 6.7 years) with previous stroke were admitted in our center for transcatheter closure of PFO with Premere Occlusion System on the basis of absence of moderate or severe atrial septal aneurysm (ASA) on Transesophageal echocardiography and intracardiac echocardiography (< 3RL or 3LR ASA and length of PFO channel >10 mm). RESULTS: The procedure was successful in all of the patients with no peri-operative and in-hospital complications. Forty-six 20 mm and twenty-four 25 mm Premere devices were implanted. Rates of procedural success, predischarge occlusion, and complication were: 100%, 95.7% and 0%, respectively. On mean follow-up of 40 ± 10.9 months (range 6-54), the follow-up occlusion rate was 98.5%. During follow-up, no cases of permanent atrial fibrillation, aortic/atrial erosion, device thrombosis, or atrioventricular valve inferences were noted. CONCLUSION: The mid-term outcomes of our registry suggests that the Premere Occlusion System may be an excellent device for patients with long-channel PFO and absence of moderate/severe ASA, offering a physiological and anatomically respective closure of PFO also in patients with hypertrophic rims.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rigatelli et al. (2010) conducted an observational in Patent foramen ovale (PFO) with previous cerebral ischemia (n=70). Premere Occlusion System was evaluated on Follow-up occlusion rate. Transcatheter closure of long-channel PFO using the Premere Occlusion System achieved 100% procedural success and a 98.5% occlusion rate at a mean follow-up of 40 months, with no complications.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: