Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
WHAT WAS THE EDUCATIONAL CHALLENGE?: Public and professional understanding of female genital anatomy is limited, affecting informed consent, clinical communication, and medico-legal interpretation in cases of sexual violence and female genital mutilation (FGM). Two-dimensional diagrams fail to convey the three-dimensional structure of the vulva, making explanations difficult for patients, students, and legal professionals. WHAT WAS THE SOLUTION?: We developed modular, dismantlable 3D-printed vulva and hymen models in prepubertal and adult versions. They feature detachable anatomical components, hymenal variants, and FGM configurations, using bright, non-anatomical colors to ensure clarity and inclusivity. HOW WAS THE SOLUTION IMPLEMENTED?: The models were used in clinical consultations to support informed consent and explain medico-legal findings; in medical and legal education to illustrate anatomical variability and debunk myths; and in courtrooms to help judges and juries understand forensic evidence. WHAT LESSONS WERE LEARNED THAT ARE RELEVANT FOR A WIDER GLOBAL AUDIENCE?: Anatomical literacy is crucial for patient autonomy and justice. 3D models enable clear, inclusive, and interactive education, countering persistent misconceptions about female anatomy. WHAT ARE THE NEXT STEPS?: Formal evaluation is planned to assess knowledge impact. Wider dissemination across clinical, legal, and public health contexts is underway.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Viallon et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: