Over 2,500 pieces of unselected Rovno amber (Late Eocene of Ukraine) are studied for their contents of syninclusia depending on amber piece weight class and taxonomic position of syninclusion components. Unlike previous publications (Perkovsky et al. 2010a, 2012), ceratopogonid components enter analysis separately (as genera or genus groups) rather than as entire taxon. This changes the resulting pattern drastically. Instead of two correlation pleiades, the air-plankton one (include biting midges), and the ‘Sciarazone’ dwellers, we have six pleiades now depending on developmental environments (terrestrial saprotrophsvs. aquatic) and adult behavior (low level fliers and tree trunk visitorsvs. air plankton and others which show no preference to tree trunks). Causes of some differences are uncertain.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Perkovsky et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: