Key result
URGENT Dyspnea study design evaluates the impact of timing and position on AHF dyspnea measurement.
Why the study?
The impact of early therapy on dyspnea in acute heart failure syndromes is not well known, and dyspnea severity may be influenced by patient positioning during measurement.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The URGENT Dyspnea study is designed to evaluate how the timing and physical position of dyspnea measurement affect symptom severity assessment in acute heart failure.
BACKGROUND: Dyspnea is a key target in both clinical management and clinical trials of acute heart failure syndromes and its relief important to patients, clinicians, investigators, and regulatory approval agencies. Despite its importance, the impact of early therapy on dyspnea is not well known. The severity of dyspnea may also be influenced by the conditions under which it is measured (ie, sitting up or lying down). URGENT Dyspnea (Ularitide Global Evaluation in Acute Decompensated Heart Failure) is a prospective multicenter study designed to address these issues. METHODS AND RESULTS: Consenting adult patients with dyspnea secondary to acute heart failure syndromes are eligible. Patients must be interviewed within one hour of first physician evaluation, typically in an emergency department or acute care setting, with dyspnea assessed by the patient using both a 5-point Likert scale and 10-point visual analog scale in the sitting (60 degrees) and then supine (20 degrees ) position if symptomatically able. Improvement of dyspnea by change in Likert and visual analog scale scores at 6 h is the primary endpoint. CONCLUSIONS: Timing of dyspnea measurement and the conditions under which it is measured may influence dyspnea severity and this may have significant implications for future acute heart failure syndromes clinical trial design that target dyspnea.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pang et al. (2008) studied Acute heart failure syndromes. Dyspnea measurement (sitting vs supine position) was evaluated on Improvement of dyspnea by change in Likert and visual analog scale scores at 6 h. The URGENT Dyspnea study is designed to evaluate the impact of timing and patient position on dyspnea measurement in acute heart failure, with no quantitative results reported in this design paper.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: