Key result
Oversized rapid deployment aortic valves are linked to ~105% higher CAVB risk, while undersizing increases PVL.
Why the study?
Complications including complete atrioventricular block and paravalvular leakage after rapid-deployment aortic valve replacement remain unresolved, and the impact of prosthesis sizing relative to aortic valve anatomy is unclear.
Does preoperative 3-dimensional computed tomographic assessment of the aortic valve annulus and LVOT predict conduction block and paravalvular leakage after rapid-deployment aortic valve replacement?
Cohort (n=187)
Does preoperative 3-dimensional computed tomographic assessment of the aortic valve annulus and LVOT predict conduction block and paravalvular leakage after rapid-deployment aortic valve replacement?
Preoperative CT-based sizing of the aortic valve annulus and LVOT can reliably predict and potentially minimize the risk of complete atrioventricular block and paravalvular leakage after rapid-deployment aortic valve replacement.
OBJECTIVES: Complications like complete atrioventricular block (CAVB) and paravalvular leakage (PVL) following rapid deployment aortic valve (AV) replacement (RDAVR) remain unresolved. Selecting an optimal size of the valve might be important to minimize the incidence of these complications. We sought to determine the impact of prosthesis size relative to the anatomic profile of the AV on the occurrence of CAVB or PVL after RDAVR. METHODS: Preoperative computed tomographic (CT) images were evaluated in patients receiving RDAVR (INTUITY ELITE) between February 2016 and December 2019. The occurrence of CAVB requiring permanent pacemaker implantation and PVL (≥ mild) was evaluated. The relative size of implants against the cross-sectional dimensions of recipients' AV annulus and left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) were calculated. RESULTS: Among 187 eligible patients, CAVB and PVL (≥ mild) occurred in 12 (6.4%) and 11 patients (5.9%), respectively. CAVB was associated with oversized RDAVR (RDAVR frame width minus average diameter of LVOT calculated from the cross-sectional area [ΔLVOTarea]: odds ratio, 2.05; 95% confidence interval, 1.28-3.30): this was with an area under the curve of 0.78 (P = 0.005). The projected probability of CAVB was <3% when the ΔLVOTarea was <1.3. In contrast, PVL was associated with under-sized RDAVR (RDAVR size divided by the longest diameter of AV annulus [index Annlong]: odds ratio, 0.64; 95% confidence interval, 0.51-0.79): This was with an area under curve of 0.94 (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: CT parameters of the AV annulus and LVOT are highly reliable in the prediction of CAVB or PVL after RDAVR. Our data might justify CT-based sizing of prosthesis for RDAVR.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Park et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Aortic valve replacement (n=187). Oversized or under-sized rapid deployment aortic valve replacement was evaluated on Complete atrioventricular block (CAVB) requiring permanent pacemaker implantation (OR 2.05, 95% CI 1.28-3.30, p=0.005). Oversized rapid deployment aortic valves predicted complete atrioventricular block (OR 2.05; 95% CI 1.28-3.30), while under-sized valves predicted paravalvular leakage (OR 0.64; 95% CI 0.51-0.79).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: