Randomized trial demonstrates that digital exercise prompts reduce sedentary time and improve well-being in adult women, highlighting the value of adaptive interventions.
This study examined whether a rule-based just-in-time adaptive exercise intervention improved subjective well-being by reducing sedentary time and increasing behavioral consistency in daily movement. Using a microrandomized trial design, 160 adult women were enrolled in an 8-week smartphone-based intervention following a 7-day run-in period. At eligible decision points, participants were randomized to receive either an adaptive exercise prompt or no prompt. Device-derived movement data were collected using a Bluetooth-enabled wrist-worn tracker, and subjective well-being was assessed using the Satisfaction with Life Scale and the WHO-5 Well-Being Index. Multilevel mixed-effects models showed that prompts significantly increased 30-min post-randomization steps and the likelihood of breaking sedentary behavior. Growth models indicated increases in daily steps and the study-specific behavioral consistency index and reductions in daily sedentary time across the intervention. Repeated-measures analyses showed improvements in life satisfaction, psychological well-being, and exercise self-efficacy from baseline to posttest, with gains largely maintained at follow-up. Indirect-effect models were consistent with the possibility that reduced sedentary time and greater behavioral consistency partly explained the association between prompt exposure and posttest well-being; however, these mediation findings depend on temporal and no-unmeasured-confounding assumptions. The findings support the potential of well-timed, rule-based digital prompts and highlight the need for independent device and index validation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: