Conceptual analysis demonstrates a lifecycle governance model for personally controlled AI agents, suggesting practical mechanisms to balance continuous identity with bounded authority.
Persistent Professional Agents presents a lifecycle governance thesis for personally controlled AI agents that persist across organizational boundaries. It examines how an owner-associated agent can enter, operate within, and leave governed environments without persistent identity becoming persistent authority or legitimate access becoming unrestricted use. The thesis proposes five governing principles and develops a Host Participation Framework for admission, qualification, scoped authority, information rights, contribution, change, evidence, and termination. It introduces Context Settlement as a mechanism for reconciling authority, information, artifacts, contributions, custody, continuing obligations, and access when participation changes or ends, and a Contribution Compact for making reciprocal transfers of value explicit. The work is presented as a research-grounded product thesis and downstream design hypothesis rather than a legal doctrine, technical standard, or claim of patent novelty. Its central question is whether existing governance mechanisms can be composed into a practical, domain-independent lifecycle model for persistent AI agents operating across institutional boundaries.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chad Cogdill (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: