Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Autonomous vehicles (AVs) could improve safety, accessibility, emissions, and efficiency in urban transport. Real-world adoption, however, remains slow because of technical, policy, behavioural, and infrastructure constraints. This chapter builds on an existing systematic review of AV literature (n = 41, peer-reviewed, 2003–23) and supplements it with additional practice evidence (AV pilot evaluations and policy) to develop an evidence-informed pathway for the policy design of urban AV adoption. It synthesises AV governance, behavioural and infrastructure requirements for their adoption, including lessons from early-adopter cities and related mobility transitions (eg, Electric Vehicles, micromobility, and shared mobility), to point to the importance of governance and implementation transparency, multi-stakeholder approaches, equity, and alignment with climate and emissions goals. The chapter closes with an actionable AV policymaking framework on the what, how, who, and when of policy action, as a step towards scaling up AVs beyond pilot-stage projects and towards resilient urban mobility.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hisham Y. Makahleh (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one related paper. Consider it for comparative context: