Key result
Semi-automatic 3D TEE estimates LAA device sizes in ~40 seconds with accuracy matching manual measurement.
Why the study?
Manual estimation of measurements for left atrial appendage occlusion device sizing is tedious, time-consuming, and subject to high interobserver and intraobserver variability.
Does a semiautomatic solution improve the speed and accuracy of estimating device size for LAA occlusion in 3-D TEE images compared to manual analysis?
Observational (n=18)
Observers blinded to each other's analyses
No
Does a semiautomatic solution improve the speed and accuracy of estimating device size for LAA occlusion in 3-D TEE images compared to manual analysis?
Effect estimate: Bias -0.40 mm (95% CI -2.21 to 1.42)
A novel semiautomatic solution for LAA occlusion device sizing in 3-D TEE images provides fast and robust estimation of clinical measurements, comparable to manual analysis.
May expedite LAA occlusion planning with manual-comparable accuracy; hypothesis-generating pending prospective validation.
Left atrial appendage (LAA) occlusion is used to reduce the risk of thromboembolism in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation by obstructing the LAA through a percutaneously delivered device. Nonetheless, correct device sizing is complex, requiring the manual estimation of different measurements in preprocedural/periprocedural images, which is tedious and time-consuming and with high interobserver and intraobserver variability. In this paper, a semiautomatic solution to estimate the required relevant clinical measurements is described. This solution starts with the 3-D segmentation of the LAA in 3-D transesophageal echocardiographic images, using a constant blind-ended model initialized through a manually defined spline. Then, the segmented LAA surface is aligned with a set of templates, i.e., 3-D surfaces plus relevant measurement planes (manually defined by one observer), transferring the latter to the unknown situation. Specifically, the alignment is performed in three consecutive steps, namely: 1) rigid alignment using the LAA clipping plane position; 2) orientation compensation using the circumflex artery location; and 3) anatomical refinement through a weighted iterative closest point algorithm. The novel solution was evaluated in a clinical database with 20 volumetric TEE images. Two experiments were set up to assess: 1) the sensitivity of the model's parameters and 2) the accuracy of the proposed solution for the estimation of the clinical measurements. Measurement levels manually identified by two observers were used as ground truth. The proposed solution obtained results comparable to the interobserver variability, presenting narrower limits of agreement for all measurements. Moreover, this solution proved to be fast, taking nearly 40 s (manual analysis took 3 min) to estimate the relevant measurements while being robust to the variation of the model's parameters. Overall, the proposed solution showed its potential for fast and robust estimation of the clinical measurements for occluding device selection, proving its added value for clinical practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Morais et al. (2019) conducted an observational in Left atrial appendage occlusion planning (n=18). Semi-automatic 3D TEE image analysis (Auto3D) vs. Manual estimation by observers was evaluated on Accuracy of landing zone diameter estimation compared to manual ground truth (Observer 1) (Bias -0.40 mm, 95% CI -2.21 to 1.42). A semi-automatic 3D transesophageal echocardiography image analysis method estimated left atrial appendage occlusion device sizes in 40 seconds with accuracy comparable to manual inter-observer variability.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: